|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrence Voon
Sports Reporter
Why did SIA sponsor an NZ team?
September 05, 2009 Saturday, 06:23 AM
Terrence Voon explains why Singapore's Dragon Boat Association needs more marketing.
THE furore over Singapore Airline's sponsorship of a New Zealand side at the recent World Dragon Boat Championships has raised the hackles of some Singaporeans.
Mr Dennis Tan, the father of one of the Singapore rowers, painted an emotive picture of how he and his child struggled to raise money for this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, only to be confronted by a Kiwi team emblazoned with the SIA logo at the event. Tags: dragon boats, singapore, sponsorship, sport
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by Terrence Voon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
Terrence Voon: "But to criticise the airline for not funding the Republic's youth team instead may not be the fairest thing to do."
A sensible enough statement and true.
Singapore Airlines is in the business of promoting itself for ITS cause. Not Singapore's.
The sooner we get this into our head the better.
This blog has attracted 37 replies.
Does anyone really, really, really think that SQ cares a fig what you, me and the dog named Boo, thinks and says?
It's like talking to a flamin' wall!!
foreignercitizen:' Would you advertise your product in the The New Paper and it be fish n chips paper the next day..or have it in the Mirror newspaper of the UK .where some 20 million people are going to see it and remember it. '
Is the above a fact or is it just a figment of your imagination?
'Simply..the kiwi team is better known than ours. Its got more commercial value and has wider appeal. '
More of your fertile imagination, or is it simply an admission of
an innate partial mentality of some westerners/Brits that they
are superior?
One small detail: in the event, the 'better known' kiwi team got nowhere
in the competition whereas the Singapore team brought home golds and bronzes. I am sure the Singapore team is now known for what it has
been able to achieved compared to the 'better known' kiwi team.
Anyway, my point being commercial consideration should in no way
stand in the way of SIA looking after its own people. Quite a separate
point really, i.e. it can do both, hence the example of MM Lee's wife
I quoted.
George: You say..For that matter, what tangible commercial advantage
has resulted for SIA through its sponsorship of the Kiwi team."
Simply..the kiwi team is better known than ours. Its got more commercial value and has wider appeal.
Would you advertise your product in the The New Paper and it be fish n chips paper the next day..or have it in the Mirror newspaper of the UK .where some 20 million people are going to see it and remember it. The very people that SQ wants..to fly their airline.
Where would you spend your advertising and sponsorship budget?
foreignercitizen,
It's a matter of opinion, isn't it?
Obviously, I am aware of the commercial consideration of SIA.
But, who are you to say SIA commercial consideration cannot co-exist
with a support your own country consideration?
Are you aware that SIA specially medically equipped one of its plane to fly to London with doctors and nurses to bring home the sick wife of MM Lee? What of the commercial consideration? In truth, it all boils down to a matter of who you are and your connection? For that matter, what tangible commercial advantage
has resulted for SIA through its sponsorship of the Kiwi team. I will take my hat off to you if you are able to produce an iota of tangible evidence to prove your point.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >