Min:24 °C Max:32 °C
» Weather Details
November 23, 2009 Monday

ST Breaking News | Blogs | Digital Life
Grace Chng
Editor, Digital Life
Radio in an iPod - Aye or nay?
September 24, 2009 Thursday, 10:02 AM
Grace Chng weighs in on Apple's latest iPod Nano.

I was on leave when Apple unveiled the new iPod Nano on Sept 9. It was only two days later in Melbourne that I managed to check the Web to see the latest Apple gizmos.

Wow! The iPod Nano is a beaut. The colours it came in – green, pink, orange, blue, silver – looked brilliant. What caught my attention was the pedometer. That would be cool since it could replace my Polar heart rate monitor when I'm travelling.

At an Apple store in downtown Melbourne, I wasn't disappointed with the new Nano. It is slim and will fit nicely in the small pocket of pair of running shorts. In addition to being an MP3 player, it is also a video camera, a pedometer and a radio.

A radio in an iPod? That sounds odd. This is the first iPod from Apple that has a radio tuner built in.

Apple has tried its best to shield users from radio ads, endless DJ chattering and music you don't like since it unveiled its first iPods in October 2001.

However, companies like Creative Technology, Diamond and Samsung had always offered radio tuners in their MP3 players. I recall the sharp remarks these companies made about the iPods: "Who would want to listen to only canned music when you can listen to fresh music played on radio?"

I remember how on many occasions, Creative Technology which was fighting with Apple for dominance of the MP3 player market, would claim that its Nomad MP3 players were superior in engineering quality and that no one would buy a digital music player without a radio.

Creative was Apple's biggest competitor then because it launched the first MP3 player in the world at the end of 1999. Apple made a stupid move by not offering radio on the iPod, it said. Moreover, my friends also complained that they can’t listen to news when they use the iPod.

Ten years later Creative still sells digital music players but it does not dominate the MP3 market while Apple has gone on to grab more than half the global market.

At heart, Creative is an engineering company that believes that every gadget should be stuffed with all sorts of features. In its eyes, this is giving customers value for money. Customers reciprocated by buying millions of these devices.

For Apple, it's about fit for use. Find out what customers need and match it accordingly with feature offerings. Don't fill gadgets with too many features that people don’t understand and won’t use.

So in my view, the radio in the new Nano fits the market segment Apple is targeting: the outdoor and active person. The Nano slips into any pair of gym shorts or it can be worn on an armband. Together with the Pedometer function (it measures the number of steps you take), perfect for the jogger, gym rat or exercise fanatic who wants to know the intensity of his workout.

Predicting consumer behaviour is an art rather than a science. Was Creative right that radio is a must-have feature in iPods or was it ahead of its time? Let me know your thoughts.

chngkeg@sph.com.sg



Tags: , ,

 
Total comments: 9
akoi
October 08, 2009 Thursday

How about a digging feature?

You know, like a shovel.

comment 7225 | Offensive? Report this comment
Madison C
October 06, 2009 Tuesday

Odd?
The only thing odd is that it took that seven or eight generations of IPODS to incream the FM radio.
Why would you consider it odd.
I say the more functions the merrier.


comment 7141 | Offensive? Report this comment
Katheryn
October 02, 2009 Friday

I say, yes.

I wrote a review on the ipod nano here: http://gizmoelectronics.blogspot.com/2009/10/all-my-childhood-memories.html

http://www.stophighcosts.com

comment 7087 | Offensive? Report this comment
Chester
September 29, 2009 Tuesday

Radio is still the most convenient way for a person to receive breaking news and for entertainment. Not everyone will be mobile yet 'connected' to the Internet to download the information to be read or podcasts to be played back. I am surprised it took this long for Apple to incorporate a radio tuner. I have a few friends that have been crying for a tuner, most of them are public transport users, so they have good reason to want the radio as they don't have access to one installed in most private vehicles. Besides the additional video camera on the 5th Gen Nano, it would be interesting to see the sales numbers of radio tuner versus non-radio tuner versions.

comment 7016 | Offensive? Report this comment
hazardman
September 25, 2009 Friday

Creative was right about all its arsenal of weapons it was going to unleash at the Apple giant. However, it fired them off at the wrong time, wrong sequence. They focused too much on throwing out the guns too early, including more features but lost the battle cos they neglected the people factor. Apple took large pains to build the brand but Creative was more tech driven. But do people needed all those? Does any1 really needed to listen to the radio if u've thousands of tunes available at your fingertips, at higher quality? Apple's focus was very much the human instead of the machine. Creative merely created a want, Apple created a need.

comment 6974 | Offensive? Report this comment

Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply:

(1) Stay on topic;
(2) No abuse, please;
(3) No personal attacks;
(4) No curse words;
(5) Don't SCREAM in ALL CAPS!

To encourage a meaningful and pleasant dialogue, comments may be deleted. We look forward to your participation!

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions