Min:24 °C Max:32 °C
» Weather Details
November 23, 2009 Monday

ST Breaking News | Blogs | Joanne's Digerati Diaries, ST's Home Ground
Joanne Lee
Straits Times Online Editor
Violence onscreen is not the point
July 14, 2009 Tuesday, 04:11 PM
Joanne Lee takes action to disarm any violent attacks off-screen.

IF YOU'VE been following the debate in our Forum pages about violent rape and torture scenes in MediaCorp drama serials - the latest missive from forum letter writer Miss Ng Yee Ting here - you'd be familiar with the complaints that have been lodged against drama scriptwriters: That they use these scenes gratuitously as a cheap way to boost viewership; appealing to people's closet fascination with rape and violent crimes.

MediaCorp's defence has been that sexual and violent crimes are topics that are reported frequently in the newspapers, and viewers should be discerning enough to detect the immorality of vicious crime.

Miss Ng's letter today, however, argued:

"Newspapers report sexual and violent crimes factually, and temper their description without visual and sound effects.

People, especially children, are more likely to be affected adversely by seemingly real crime happening in front of them than in a factual newspaper report.

Thus, MediaCorp is wrong to justify scenes of physical violence and rape because newspapers do so."

I agree with Miss Ng and I do believe that youngsters during their years of character development exposed to such images on free-to-air channels might develop various levels of acceptable social behaviour. (Remember, I myself was hit a couple of times during relationship squabbles in my younger days as I blogged about before.)

But whichever school of thinking one leans towards, I decided to do something about it for myself.

Having been a journalist for more than a decade - in print, on telly and now online - I've slowly been more accessible to the public and have attracted attention both positive and negative.

I remember a scary email a couple of years ago from a viewer suggesting I get familiar with taxi company call numbers as I finished my shift at midnight and it wasn't safe waiting for a taxi by the road. He continued to say that, to ensure my safety, he had followed my taxi home the previous night.

Naturally, I freaked out. My family freaked out. Everybody freaked out.

So, after a recent family gathering during which we were talking about violent crime, my cousin decided that I required self-defence lessons. He'd been studying various forms of martial arts over the years and showed up at my office building yesterday with wooden knives and sticks for an intense one-on-one session in the gym.

(Aside: Punching and slapping one's cousin, and having him punch and slap me, is a rather awkward experience.)

Focusing on defence moves, he gave me very common-sensical yet very easily forgettable tips:

(1) Be alert: This might sound so obvious that it borders on the ridiculous as advice. Not so. How many of us walk around with our iPod earphones embedded in our ears, depriving ourselves a key sensory faculty - hearing?

(2) Be prepared: Again, so obvious. All boy and girl scouts know this. But I was warned not to wait around in public places leaning against a wall or a railing as it would put me off centre and more susceptible to being tackled.

(3) Don't attack back: If someone approaches you front-on and engages in close combat, it's better to go with the flow and let the attacker throw himself or herself off balance. (This assumes that you're balanced yourself though.)

Alas, my adhering to point (2) and (3) is somewhat compromised by something that my male cousin didn't anticipate: Girls wear high-heels. Oops. When we were younger, He-Man (my cousin) hadn't had to protect Sheera (me) on account of my footwear.

Nevertheless, I'll be taking his no-iPod advice. That, at least, will not deprive me of my hearing faculty when it comes to being aware.

So what's the bottom line of this blog entry? Just that whether you agree or disagree that the proliferation of violence in drama serials correlates to the proliferation of violence in real life, it makes sense to be prepared for any circumstance.

Anyone else has tips to share here?



Tags: , , ,

 
Total comments: 44
dorkedog
August 05, 2009 Wednesday

hello..somebody please tell me..what is wrong with the word....f-a-g-s that it needs to be blotted out?

comment 6351 | Offensive? Report this comment
dorkedog
August 05, 2009 Wednesday

Instead of the rubbish that Ms Lee is beginning to write about, should she not turn her attention to another social ..oops I mean municipal issue like..the startling rise in young smokers in Singapore.
Or is it perhaps too hard to and not safe to talk about? Why ever not, one asks? Search me!!

There is no government on earth that has a social policy on smoking. It's all to do with the high duties and excise it derives from tobacco sales. Okay, the revenue helps to pay for social services in some countries.

Whilst travellers coming in here,cannot buy duty free, we will sell them cartons going out. After all, it's not our responsibility to care for their health, right? Its still about making money.

But if this government is really, really serious about the rise in smokers, especially among the young; then raise the price of a pack of **** to $20.
More revenue for the government and immediately less smokers who really then cannot afford to smoke anymore MUST and WILL quit.

And as well, seek out and fine heavily the errant shopkepers who are continuing to sell **** to underaged smokers. Even take away their tobacco licence.

Ah, but its all too hard work for an ST jouno to blog, anyway. Too hard, too uch trouble. No "me,me" thing in it.
Maybe, only Loh Keng Fatt can pen it. He seems to be the only one with the maturity and social conscience to care enough.





comment 6350 | Offensive? Report this comment
amanstbasher
August 03, 2009 Monday

@Singapore Girl Next Door:
You say.."Why the flagrant attack against the Editor?"
Did it sound like an attack against the Online Editor?
Thought that for all the parts, it was littered with compliments.
I repeat ..the Online Ed is a wasted talent in ST.
The attack was against ST or did you not read it?
Then you say...."The quality of the pieces and comments at ST's blogs are just horrible. There are discerning few. "
I dont know about "horrible" but I would call it...generally poor.
I have said that a long time ago.
But then there are but (sadly) too few of us discerning enough to say it...out loud.

comment 6299 | Offensive? Report this comment
Singapore Girl Next Door
August 03, 2009 Monday

Why the flagrant attack against the Editor?

I'm asking the question....because....er....I'm curious....not that I have anything personal against her detractors.

If this is a genuine attack against ST, then the criticisms should be as crass to other writers as well. But there is so much emphasis on the Editor, and the fact the she is the Editor has been mentioned too often....as if to remind her.

Could it be that this guy also works for ST and loathes the fact he lost the position to someone...er...."younger"?

So bad of me to speculate....but just a thought.

The quality of the pieces and comments at ST's blogs are just horrible. There are discerning few, but makes me wonder if majority of these are from the same set of people.

comment 6297 | Offensive? Report this comment
gigi
August 01, 2009 Saturday

http://www.iq-test.sg/#114704

comment 6274 | Offensive? Report this comment

Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply:

(1) Stay on topic;
(2) No abuse, please;
(3) No personal attacks;
(4) No curse words;
(5) Don't SCREAM in ALL CAPS!

To encourage a meaningful and pleasant dialogue, comments may be deleted. We look forward to your participation!

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions