Min:24 °C Max:32 °C
» Weather Details
November 23, 2009 Monday

ST Breaking News | Blogs | ST's Sports Arena
Rohit Brijnath
Senior Correspondent
On Lewis Hamilton's sin...
April 09, 2009 Thursday, 06:55 PM
Rohit Brijnath remembers another man who is a sort of sporting saint.

SOME days I just don't like sport; don't like what it stands for, don't like the way it is played. I'm talking about Lying Lewis, of course. This was that perfect moment we often talk about, when winning just becomes too important.

One of the most interesting men in sport, a former US gridiron coach, Vince Lombardi, once said: "If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?" Fair enough.

I like competition, like teams and men challenging each other, but if there's no spirit, no respect for the rules, then it defeats the very idea of sport.

In Lombardi's biography, a distinction is made, a very valuable one, about paying the price to win  - sweat, perservance, discipline - and winning at any price.

People will always cheat because its part of the human condition. In sport, either they think they can't get caught or that they're bigger than their sport.

Lewis' lie was astonishing, for I have met him, though only briefly, and he seemed a driven young man but one so sure of his talent, not a man requiring a fiddling with the truth to win or get ahead.

But sport does funny things to people, it turns them, it leads them into a sort of temporary insanity. Lewis is 24, he will learn.

Still, at these times, for reasons you will shortly understand, I remember one man and one statue. The statue is in Melbourne and it is of one man helping another. The helper is John Landy, the helped is Ron Clarke.

If you like running, you will know Landy; if you want to read about Landy, go buy The Perfect Mile, a brilliant retelling of Roger Bannister, Landy and Wes Santee's chase to break the four-minute mile barrier.

Landy ran to win and was clear about that. "Sport's about winning and records," he once said, and was uncomfortable that what he became famous for had nothing really to do with winning. It wasn't about running fast but about slowing down.

In Melbourne's Olympic Park in April 1956, Landy and Clarke were running in the Australian mile championship, when Clarke tripped.

This in itself it was unusual, for in the longer distances runners jostle, shoulders collide, legs entangle, bodies fall. How many times have we seen this? Hicham El Guerrouj fell in the 1500 metres in Atlanta 1996. Mary Decker fell in the 3000 metres in Los Angeles 1984.

Spiking is common, too. In 1996, the 1500m winner, Noureddine Morceli was spiked. Here, Landy, leaping over Clarke, spikes his compatriot in the shoulder as he hurdles over him.

Life is goes on.

And then it happens, for no seemingly explicable reason. Landy, who wants to win, whose life is based on movement, now stops.

In the many retellings of the story by journalists (I wasn't born) and onlookers, Landy goes to Clarke, checks on him, apologises, brushes cinder off him, helps him up, all this of course occuring in a flash of a second or three.

What instinct made him do this? Who knows, maybe not even Landy, but it is remarkable. Writer Harry Gordon, who watched the race and was moved, described it as a "senseless piece of chivalry", a sort of beautiful madness.

Clarke then, reportedly, said to Landy, "I'm all right, run, run". And Landy ran.

And this defies belief really, for in some sort of divine justice, Landy catches the field. He beats the field. He wins.

Of course, a young man who I told the story to yesterday, said in amazement, "he won?". I said, you're missing the point, which is that he stopped.

I am sure this story means different things to different people. Me, I'm just glad that in the time of Hamilton I have this memory of Landy.



Tags: , , ,

 
Total comments: 8
Anil Alaham
April 12, 2009 Sunday

1) Great story.
2) I am running to buy The Perfect Mile

Thanks Rohit. Your writing is often inspiring Mate.

comment 3712 | Offensive? Report this comment
Eddy
April 12, 2009 Sunday

A lot of comments tried to defend Hamilton by comparing this to incidents in other sports. They are simply missing the points. Different sports have different traditions & there is a level of behavior that will eventually become unacceptable. A golfer will & should accept an opponent's lie simply because it is a gentleman's game by rule in a lot of situation. If you dive in football & get away with it, you probably will be praised in the dressing room. The fact that Hamilton lied again & again eventually need to apologized speak volumes. If you examine his apology carefully, you will work out that he is still lying. By defending him, you are only bringing yourself to his level.

comment 3704 | Offensive? Report this comment
Jack Frost
April 11, 2009 Saturday

Great story. Thanks!

comment 3690 | Offensive? Report this comment
Karan
April 11, 2009 Saturday

To lie once at the first hearing immediately on a spur of the moment strategy maybe forgiven, but to lie repeatedly, even after being presented with the radio conversations cannot. The lie not only gave McLaren and Lewis a podium finish but also caused Jarno Trulli and Toyota to be handed a 25s penalty that they clearly did not deserve.
An apology in Malaysia cannot take away the fact that Trulli would have lost 6 points if the stewards had not discovered the lie.
Neither Lewis nor McLaren did anything to bring to light the correct facts after the first hearing.

comment 3687 | Offensive? Report this comment
pimpmaster
April 10, 2009 Friday

Performance and Politics...
...and how we keep the two separate.

We know two facts -

(1) Hamilton drove his best to get to 4th place
(2) The McLaren team lied in purpose

McLaren was unethical, and deserves the monetary penlty. But Lewis Hamilton did not cheated on the track, and should still earn the 4th place.

But what we are seeing is FIA taking advantage of McLaren's vulnerability to penalize it both monetarily, and in terms of racing points, eventhough racing points has nothing to do with this.

This is like FIFA stripping Italy of all points in the world championship because one it's player lied to the referee about a foul.

That one deserves a RED card...but taking away points?

People who insist that this is about morality have no creativity.

comment 3682 | Offensive? Report this comment

Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply:

(1) Stay on topic;
(2) No abuse, please;
(3) No personal attacks;
(4) No curse words;
(5) Don't SCREAM in ALL CAPS!

To encourage a meaningful and pleasant dialogue, comments may be deleted. We look forward to your participation!

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions