|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goh Eng Yeow
Markets Correspondent
Bernanke's despair
March 04, 2009 Wednesday, 03:37 PM
Goh Eng Yeow wants the ethics of selling financial products to change.
ANOTHER week, another loss of 100 points from the slowly sinking Straits Times Index. Since the start of the year, STI has lost 13.5 per cent. About half of the loss took place in the past two weeks. When will all this bleeding end? Apparently, we are not the only party beating our chests in frustration over the erosion of our savings and investments, as a result of the collapse in stock prices brought on by the global financial crisis. One angry US senator ticked off Fed chairman Ben Bernanke last night for failing to halt the rot in the tottering US financial system which was responsible for so much of the woes suffered by the rest of the world. "People just about have had enough," Senator Lindsey Graham told Mr Bernanke. They are tired of all the money being poured into troubled US lenders "and nothing seems to be changing". For the rest of us watching the broadcast live on CNBC, Senator Graham's outburst encapsulates our exasperation with the lack of progress in getting the banks back on their feet again. Some of that money came from Temasek Holdings and GIC when they invested in Merrill Lynch and Citigroup respectively. While I could not recall what Mr Bernanke had said in the past about the troubled US lenders whose oversight came under his jurisdiction, I was taken aback by what he had to say last night about beleaguered AIG which had been supervised by the New York Insurance Commissioner. Nothing had made him more angry, he said. AIG had exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system and there was no oversight on its financial products division which was basically a hedge fund which made a huge number of irresponsible bets and took big losses. It takes two hands to clap. Surely, the parties at the other end of AIG's transactions should also take some responsibilities for the problems which the insurer now finds itself embroiled in, some senators wanted to know. But this is the part of Mr Bernanke's testimony which I find troubling. "I just don't know what to do about it," he said, even though he was as angry as everyone else. He might only have been referring to problems at AIG but his frank admission strikes fear into the rest of us. Have the gale force winds whipped up by the financial storm reached such an intensity that even he is finding himself at a loss as to how to steer the ship safely back to shore? At this juncture, it is useful to recount what HSBC chairman Stephen Green had to say about the failings, which had afflicted his otherwise well-run bank, when its full-year results were released on Monday. "Inappropriate products were sold inappropriately by many…Underlying all these events is a question about the culture and ethics of the industry. People had given up asking whether something was the right thing to do and focused on only whether it was legal and complied with the rules," he said. As if to underline that such a culture still persists in our own backyard despite the heavy losses suffered by investors, I got an e-mail from a reader this morning alleging that some financial advisers had been offering incentives to their clients to draw down on their CPF accounts to buy financial products. He wrote: "The markets gave exceptional returns from 2004 to 2007 which created a superficial win-win situation. A win for the investors taking profit, a win for the advisor in terms of increased remuneration and a win for the firm in terms of extra fees earned." But while the market collapse had stopped such "churning" practices, the problem still persists. "Errant financial advisors are waiting for the next upturn to exploit the situation again," he warned. Looks like a seismic change in attitude towards finances in general will be needed in order to get the global financial system up on its feet again. No wonder even Mr Bernanke is in despair. There is no easy solution in sight. Tags: stocks
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by Goh Eng Yeow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
Don't let Senator Lindsey Graham fool you! He's one of the corporatists/fascists who caused this problem to begin with. Many call him the Corporate Welfare Queen.
Graham is only showboating and rattling his sword until he can maneuver into a leveraged deal with the "opposing" party in a gang of compromisers who usually just sell out to the highest bidders. His only problem with Obama's plan is that it did not give enough to the people who finance his campaigns and provide other favors.
I voted for Obama hoping he would not keep providing corporate welfare by keeping our empire in countries all over the world and propping up and creating financial bubbles that crash and hurt those most vulnerable in this country. He's chosen the path of economic fascism and will only make the problems worse. Government induced inflation is criminal theft in the minds of most Americans.
Graham requested $305 million in earmarks for fiscal year 2007 alone. Then he promised to follow McCain's example of not requesting earmarks. Since McCain's loss, I don't suspect he'll keep that pledge and will compromise like most of the weak-spined fascists in D.C.
Economic principles will win out in the end no matter what any government entity does. In the meantime, Obama and the others in the "District of Criminals" will take as much power from the people as possible by pretending to "stimulate" the economy in the grand traditions of Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin.
Bernake is angry at AIG and is at a loss to act! It is clear the main culprits responsible for this seemingly unresolvable financial turmoil are the past or present hot shots behind AIG, the troubled banks, regulators, etc. Therefore, while trying to solve the problem, equally important also is to bring these culprits to justice and punish them severely. If existing laws are inadequate to do this effectly, then new laws have to be enacted quickly. This imorality has to stop.
I fired my financial advisor even tho he is my friend.
Why? He could not deliver on anything even in boom times and cannot explain clearly how I can increase my savings via investments.
Over time, his advice was all bad for me. Losses > Gains.
Financial products are hard to regulate and there is little transparency. On the other end could be some 'gambler' with fancy degrees in financial 'engineering' using your money to make fancy bets which have only 2 outcomes:
1. He makes a lot of money, then shares a tiny percentage with you.
2. He loses the money, then an apology letter for you if any.
So we are the losers in the long run.
How to overcome this? Don't buy their lousy products!
Take control of your own money 100%. At least you can be satisfied you either become a millionaire or pauper at your own hands.