|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teo Cheng Wee
Foreign Correspondent
Dynasty: Umno-style
March 25, 2009 Wednesday, 05:16 PM
Teo Cheng Wee jostles with the crowds at the Umno elections.
In Kuala Lumpur FOR a good hour today around lunch time, 50 energetic young men jostled and cheered outside the Tun Hussein Onn hall at the party's headquarters at Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC). Divided into two camps, each was trying to drown out the war cry of the other. One side was cheering for former Selangor chief minister Khir Toyo. Another chanted and sang songs for outgoing Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi's son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin. Both men are fighting for the Umno Youth chief post. Neither side waned even after 60 minutes of shouting themselves hoarse. Yes, the Umno general assembly may have started yesterday, but today, with the commencement of the party polls, the noise and colour have arrived with a bang. In the PWTC building, the cheering masses washed the hall in a sea of red and white, the colours of Umno. It is broken up only by a dash of pink, provided by the young women of Puteri Umno, the young women's wings. It is one of three Umno wings holding elections today; the other two being Umno Youth and the women's wing Wanita. This year's Umno elections are more heated than previously, with more candidates and more posts contested than usual. And at this final stretch, after their chosen candidates had spent a good part of the last few months on their protracted campaigns, it was now the grassroots' turn in the spotlight. When the all-important delegates - who will choose the next leaders of the party - arrived early in the morning, hundreds of supporters were already lying in wait. Even before 8am, many of them have lined up by the escalators, furiously shoving name cards of their candidates into the hands of the delegates, who have come from all over the country. Each card has a smiling picture of the man or woman they were cheering for, along with the candidate's assigned number printed in bold for good measure. Others choose somewhat more unconventional methods: The supporters of Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar, who is running for a vice-president post, walked around with a somewhat creepy cardboard cut-out mask of the minister, slightly frightening anyone who ran into them with their hollowed-out eyes. But ultimately it is a numbers game - literally. Each candidate is assigned a serial number, and they must place a lot of importance on it, because the numbers are found everywhere. It is printed neatly on T-shirts (Khir's boys all have "02" emblazoned on the back of theirs, while Khairy's have "03" on theirs). The numbers are also on large foam hands, on laminated signs that supporters hang around their necks, and the shiny round badges that many of them have pinned on their bags and clothes. Even the cheers revolve around the numbers. Sometimes all you could hear were numbers: You could catch people chanting "kosong sembilan" (Malay for "zero-nine") without making out who they were actually shouting for. Their point, we presume is, if for some reason the names are too hard to pick out from the list, at least remember which number to put the big "X" next to. For some candidates though, nothing replaces their personal touch, even at this 11th hour. As delegates got ready to vote, Dr Khir could still be seen drifting among them, busily shaking hands with everyone before they entered the hall to cast their vote. He will be hoping that tonight he will be No.1, not No.2. Read the breaking news story here. Tags: malaysia, politics
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by Teo Cheng Wee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
Hi Pimpmaster. Most Singaporeans are apolitical comparing to our neigbouring countries. Just how many of us try to read up our constitution. I am an active Thailand blogger and you will be suprised with the amount of insights of their political system and constitution. Until we become more concern about our politics, we will not get too many competent oppositions.
Hi Eric,
I'm glad we both agree on the key issue.
But having ZERO opposition in our current government is for me something not to be desired. When we finally move on to the next generation of leaders, I hope you are right that Singaporeans will make the right choice.
But despite our education, I hope we are not always presented with false choices every election year - given that we have PAP, and ... oh, yeah, there's really no one else.
We had elections in the past where the choice is either X or Y but Y had recently been put to jail or bankrupted.
We need an opposition, otherwise (although you may not agree, and I respect that) we can't call ourselves a real democracy.
Complacency made the Filipinos gave up real democracy for Marcos, who at that time was considered comparable to our very own Lee Kuan Yew.
Who could have known Marcos will betray his people? Only an opposition would.
Pimpmaster, I enjoy reading your post. I still have hope and faith in the democratic system whether it is liberal or constitutional democracy. Compare with Communist or socialist system, Democracy protects individual rights and allow each citizens regardless of race and religion a chance to vote and participate in chosing its leaders.
However perfecting the constitution for the good and protection of its citizens, is much more harder to achieve.
Whether a citizen is against or for the country system, they must act within the constitution. Any non-constitution methods to seize power like a coup is not acceptable and only breeds more disorder.
I am not familair with the Muslim situation in Philippines and not sure what you mean by Muslims not represented in politics. If they are citizens, they have a vote and I would believe they are quite a sizeable population and will therefore have the leverage in an election.
I think in our fast globally connected information age, we read and know more about our country and leaders than our father generation. Citizens, NGOs, interest groups and not forgetting the oppositions are the check and balance.
Singapore owes much to LKY and the generation of good leaders. More importantly is the structure that has been built which will allow a suitable, well educated and people person to step up to be the next leader.
Thank you
Take Thailand as an example. Taksin was ousted due to ground swell of information regarding his grafts and loyalty to the monarchy. This may not happen 30-40 years ago where accessibilities to information is very much limited.
Hi Eric,
I'm happy you still believe in justice.
Regardless of political system, there are two ways to effect change -
(1) Be part of the system
(2) Be against the system
Those that are conveniently accomodated by the system, people like you and me, can always claim that everyone should follow the provisions of the system, a democratic one as we claim, and as so, should accomodate the interests of the constituents, for the common good.
But believe it or not, there are people which are excluded from that political system, and effectively limit their capacity to enable change.
I know it would be much easier for you to agree if I quote something outside of Singapore.
Take the Muslims in Philippines for example. Eventhough a democracy, the Muslims are not represented in the political system. No one fights for their interests. Hence, they are marginalized and discriminated.
You and I will agree that there is no real democracy there. This is the politically correct statement rather than say democracy does not work.
However, often times, mishaps like these are taken out of context and are used as justification that "liberal democracy does not work, and is not good for countries like Singapore or Malaysia".
So I find it odd to conclude that we should not fly because airplanes crash.
Now, there is a reason why there is an affirmative and opposition in any democratic government. It is the reflection of the polarity in political interests of the constituents.
But if there is no opposition (much like how Muslims are excluded in the political system in Philippines), what do you think does that say about the system?
It is about check and balance. It is about accountability.
If not, it is always easy to say the system is working just fine.
But who is checking?
Democracy is like a big airplane. It has a pilot, and a co-pilot. But without a co-pilot, the pilot will always blame the airplane for any mishap.
How do we, the passengers, know?
We Singaporeans are extremely gifted in that for 3 generations we had leaders that are generally good and trustworthy.
Singapore works because of the deadly combination of a system, and the assumption that there will always be meritocracy.
But after LKY, GCT and LSL, who is next?
I hope not Marcos. This is where, you see, the Filipinos failed. Which explains why they now cling to democracy for dear life, ever since.
You need check and balance.
Democracy, done the right way, has to ultimately be Singapore's insurance policy before that too happens to us.
Hi Pimpmaster, what good for us to second guess. Corruption is not based on personal perception. It has to be convicted through a proper judiciary system. What chaos if we decide to instigate street justice.
1 2 3 >