|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joanne Lee
Straits Times Online Editor
Getting the best reply of all
March 16, 2009 Monday, 04:23 PM
Joanne Lee replies to the comments on her previous dating abuse entry.
FIRST things first: A big thank you to all those who responded to my blog entry on Friday Was Rihanna semi-responsible? Domestic/dating abuse is a very serious issue, which is why I thought I'd share my very mild experience and how it changed my life. Secondly: To all those who pointed out that by sharing my experience I was being socially irresponsible and doing an injustice to victims of serious abuse, all I can say is this - I was merely trying to share what I learnt and how I think it has helped me "temper my temper" over the years. I was sharing my experience; I wasn't saying it applied to all abuse cases. Here's how it all came about. There I was, working on a Friday evening, listening to a re-run of Larry King on CNN about how R&B singer Chris Brown had been arraigned earlier in the week for beating up his star girlfriend Rihanna. The news point was that Rihanna appeared to have forgiven him for the horrendous beating and Larry's question was: What sort of message was this sending out to young people who see pop stars as role models? Larry King had brought up the point that, although most everyone has castigated Chris Brown for his extreme show of violence, there were other reactions from various quarters saying Rihanna possibly provoked him to perpetuating her boyfriend's chokehold-ear-biting-death-threat explosion. In fact, one of Larry's studio guests pointed out several surveys indicating some teens blame both Chris Brown and Rihanna. My cousin sent me one of these surveys after I blogged: Boston youths say Rihanna was to blame for her beating. Now, that absolutely floored me. "Yet 46 percent of the kids surveyed said that they thought Rihanna was to blame for the beating; 51 percent said Brown was at fault, and 52 percent said that both of them were somehow responsible. And, according to the survey, a significant number of males and females said Rihanna was now destroying Chris Brown's career. The two got back together, which, while horrifying to many parents, doesn't seem to surprise many teenagers; 71 percent of respondents said that arguing is a normal part of a relationship, and 42 percent responded that fighting (presumably physically) was also normal." That was what made me think about my own experience. That was what reminded me what a hoyden I could be when I was younger. That was what made me thankful I had learnt from those days and am a much less argumentative person these days. That was the point of my blog entry! Do I think the young age of 19-year-old Chris Brown - or any abusive man (or woman) - allows him to get away with laying their hands on their partner? Of course not! I was quite shocked that readers of my blog thought I was trying to excuse abusers of any age! Here's a sample: (1) Jolene: "This is incredibly irresponsible coverage. People in abusive relationships are often stuck there precisely because they tell themselves, "If only I was a better wife/husband, if only I was a better parent, if only I wasn't so annoying, if only I behaved better, it would all be different, he/she loves me and it could all be so wonderful, if only I could FIX MYSELF." What I was trying to say was: I eventually FIXED MYSELF FOR MYSELF. (2) R: "As a 23 year old female, I find your post indicative that you have major self-esteem problems and seem to enjoy the game/challenge of dating aggressive men - and making excuses for their violent acts." Thankfully, my current partner's only acts of violence involve him helping me kill monsters when we play World of Warcraft together. And hey, if I'm ready to put myself out here in a public forum, do you really think I have self-esteem problems? ;) (3) DeeW: "You are destined to be abused again. You have the mentality of an abused woman. You should be embarassed by this blog entry as it highlights that you see yourself unworthy to be treated with respect." Thankfully, the only abuse I get these days are from my blog readers. LOL. Does that mean I see myself as unworthy to be treated with respect? Nah. It just shows I love writing. (4) Tristan Coleshaw: "Ms Lee, if your opinion on the Chris Brown case is a result of years of psychotherapy to deal with your abusive relationship, then you've been poorly served by mental health services." Please, read my initial blog again? My opinion on the Chris Brown case is that Rihanna should leave him immediately. (5) Kaffein: "Stupid is as stupid says. It’s like saying maybe a wife should change her attitude towards sex if her husband had raped/violated her." Please do read my blog again. I stressed that my ex only hit out a couple of times, and they were very MILD cases because he stopped after one hit, knowing he was wrong. I think you've taken my statement in a rather exaggerated way. I DO NOT in any way think a man can be excused for raping or violating his wife. Many have asked for a retraction and an apology from myself and/or The Straits Times for publishing my previous blog entry. That's a bit of an over-reaction when all I was saying was that I had learnt from my own date-abuse experience; when I wasn't even apportioning blame to the ex or myself. The only apology I will offer is that I was perhaps not clear enough in my message. So here's a big sorry to those I offended. But you know what? I got the best response to my blog entry via Facebook from my ex: "Thank you for forgiving me." Now that response is one that really means something to me. Tags: crime, entertainment, family
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by Joanne Lee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
Dear pimpmaster,
I'm much more worried about the apathetic ones, than flustered sharing opinions with passionate sorts like you. Thank you very much. In any case, yes, I'm glad that you do agree that we should always look at the circumstance of every case closely before we say our piece. Otherwise, we would have to condemn people like Ms Ahluwalia too.
Hi invento>
You'd have to forgive people like me who are passionate about this and similar issues.
I see where you are going, but going back to Ms. Lee's acrticle - Are women responsible when they are physically abused?
Men can be abused too, all agree on that.
Unfortunately, the topic is about the conventional case where it is the men who inflict violence.
I need not say more. I only wanted for you to agree too that violence should never never never be blamed on the victim. And I'm happy you did.
So yes to your last question ;)
Dear pimpmaster,
Thank you for taking the effort and sparing the emotion to comment back. All the same, there is no need to get so angry over a stupid internet posting such as from silly little me. :)
Perhaps the analogy of a dog is rather unfortunate here because you have extended it in all ways it was not meant to be. You seem to be obsessed with the fact that only men can abuse women, and while that is undeniably overwhelmingly the case, there are abused men too. But since you put it this way, I'll ask you directly to answer this question which I addressed to Jolene (who, unfortunately, is no longer with us here in this discussion).
"Let us imagine a case where the husband was being verbally and emotionally abusive without physical violence ever (and for that matter, the threat of physical violence as well), a scene I'm sure you can easily conceive and admit. Does it make it okay for her to hit him or to kill him even?"
This question has to be taken in the context of Ms Kiranjit Ahluwalia, whose case you can google up yourself. Note that she eventually set free on appeal. I can accept Ms Kiranjit Ahluwalia's justification for her particularly horrible act as self-defence in response to violence. If the husband had not been physically violent, but merely verbally and emotionally abusive (ie. the situation I'm asking you about), is there a difference?
I'm not saying here, nor have I ever said, that all physical violence should be blamed on the victim. Never, never, never. But just as in Ms Ahluwalia's case, where the violence she perpetuated which resulted in a death was justified by circumstance, can we not be a little less absolute about all our categories, and look long and hard at the circumstances first of all before getting so morally outraged?
SO IT BOILS DOWN TO THIS -
Let's all proclaim to the world that beating women is wrong, but like dogs, let's blame them anyway.
The man has nothing to do with.
Oh oh oh....I stand corrected.
The man has PARTLY nothing to do with it....since the dog is afterall SEMI or PARTLY responsible.
....I know a lot of folks here will be surprised to realize women are human beings too.
So let me ask this question again - for those who treat women in their lives like dogs, do you think they are semi-responsible when treated as one?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >