|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Jayaram
India Correspondent
India's booming baby tourism
August 08, 2008 Friday, 04:25 PM
P. Jayaram on how baby Manji reminds him of his niece's twins. In New Delhi THE rise of "fertility tourism" in India has led to a controversial battle for custody over a baby girl, Manji Yamada. She was born to an Indian surrogate mother and is therefore for all purposes an India citizen. Normally, a foreign couple would just fly out with such a baby within a couple of weeks after birth.
Baby Manji has put the spotlight on India's
booming 'fertility tourism' industry and the lack of laws governing it. Source: AFP
Commercial surrogacy has been legal in India since 2002 and the infant born in this manner is then legally adopted by its biological parents. In this case, unfortunately, the biological father, Dr. Ikufumi Yamada, 45, a Tokyo surgeon, and his then-wife Yuki, 41, divorced a month before Manji was born. Indian law does not allow the adoption of a girl by a single father.
Most people in Delhi share the views expressed by Dr. Hrishikesh Pai, consultant gynaecologist at Mumbai’s Lilavati Hospital. "Sometimes, you have to bypass the laws, and make an exception. This is a bona fide case and the father obviously wants the baby back. Therefore, a special effort should be made to give a passport to the baby." But the Japanese embassy officials in Delhi reportedly told Dr. Yamada they cannot issue a passport for the child without a no-objection certificate from the Indian government. He has now gone back to Japan to consult his lawyers. "I want to take my baby home in Japan but I can't. I'm very worried about the child. I want to bring the baby to Japan because she's very small and has also become sick. So I'm very worried about her," he told a television channel. Surrogacy and adoption are gaining in popularity in both urban and rural India. As a result, the demand for treatment for infertility, including surrogate mothers, egg donors, IVF procedures et cetera is on the rise. Not only poor, lower-middle class women, who agree to become surrogate mother because they desperately need the money, even college girls are known to donate eggs to make some quick money. But it would be wrong to say there is no prejudice about surrogacy or adoption. Take the case of my niece Anuradha, a journalist. Early this year, Anu and her husband Raghu, a Major in the Indian Army, adopted twin girls from an adoption agency in Delhi. They have been married for seven years. Anu’s parents were happy; so were all of us. But her maternal grandparents, being high-caste Brhamins, were clearly disturbed. "Who are the children’s real parents? What caste are they from?" They had unending questions, though at the last family get together, both were fondly carrying little Sarayu and Reva. India has seen more people coming to the country for fertility services such as surrogacy treatment because of low cost and good medical facilities like infertility treatment clinics guaranteeing "100 percent success". English-speaking doctors, who put Western patients particularly at ease, have all contributed to make India a hub for fertility tourism. According to experts, a surrogacy treatment cycle would cost over US$50,000 in the US while it comes to only US$ 10,000 in India. If you go by Dr. Aniruddha Malpani, a fertility specialist in Mumbai, IVF treatment in India costs between US$ 4,000-5,000 while in Singapore it would cost one and half times more. Tags: india, medical
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by P. Jayaram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
A bit sad, a bit disappointed and a whole lot of anger...the mind is a plethora of mixed albeit disconnected feelings after reading this story from a country of paradoxes.
After having lived 32 years in New Delhi, India and having seen first hand the social, physical and mental disparities, I still feel unsure of addressing these kind of issues.
As a medical tourism destination, India offers a lot of cheap quick fixes to those who earn in Dollars, Pounds, Euros or even Yen. If you are lucky, you get your hands on a gold mine by just shoving some rupees in the "CORRECT" slot.
Even though I have been living here in Singapore for 1+ years now, I still sometimes cannot help but cringe at the various policies (or the lack of them) that make no sense but create only hurdles.
Indis ia a land of 1.2 billion people, 40% of those fall below the poverty line. 1000s of children are born everyday, and I feel sad to say this, many or abandoned or even worse, are put to sleep forever, just because their parents cannot afford them.
As I said, I am in two minds. I don't know whether to protest against surrogacy or support it or remain neutral. But one thing I know for sure.
If the government really wants the country to progress or move towards the ranks of developed nations, it had to understand that PEOPLE are it's biggest (and largest) resource. By allowing something like Nithari to happen or to let parents get rid of their children because they cannot afford them, INDIA is surely not on the path of progression.
There are 1000s of couples who are not blessed with children, there are 1000s of couples who are blessed with children but do not need them. Can the govt of India step in and make things easier for foreigners to adopt kids from India?