Min:24 °C Max:32 °C
» Weather Details
November 23, 2009 Monday

ST Breaking News | Blogs | On The Money, ST's Home Ground
Goh Eng Yeow
Markets Correspondent
When Citi swings the axe
November 18, 2008 Tuesday, 09:58 AM
Goh Eng Yeow likens the mega layoff to watching the movie Titanic.

ALL day long yesterday, CNBC and Bloomberg Television were giving updates about possible job cuts at beleaguered US financial giant Citigroup. As I glanced up at the TV set above me occasionally to get the latest figure, the number jumped from 10,000 at mid-afternoon, then to 30,000, 40,000 and finally 50,000 just before I left the office at about nine at night. 

The experience was unnerving. Even though I have been reporting on the global financial crisis since it erupted last August, I am somewhat distraught by the latest developments.  

I get this surreal feeling that I am watching the movie Titanic over and over again, as one troubled Wall Street titan after another runs aground in treacherous waters, killing its many occupants as it sinks.

And like the friends and relatives who hang anxiously around waiting for the latest scrap of news on whether their loved ones survived the crash, I find myself becoming similarly worked up over the many Citi people that I got to know over the years. 

Will they survive the culling of the herd ?

When a major financial institution such as Citigroup goes into crisis mode, it is unlikely that Singapore, where it employs over 9,000 staff, will be spared as heads are lopped off across the globe.

Even my usually ebullient colleague Francis Chan was affected. We heard him last night exploding about an email sent out by Citi to postpone Thursday's year-end media party.

Nothing in the email had given any indication of the cataclysm, about to overtake Citi, which had been given plenty of airtime by the foreign TV stations. 

It merely said: “We have received feedback from many of you that the proposed date for the party (Thu 20 Nov) is not ideal, and have decided to postpone the event to a later date.”

As one friend noted in an SMS, pressing ahead with a party at such a time would have been extremely insensitive. “Won’t it smack of Nero fiddling while Rome burns ?” she observed. 

But what I find extremely galling is the glee which some people seem to be greeting this bloodletting at Citi. 

One British newspaper this morning described the job cuts at Citi as a health kick which was long overdue. 

“A headcount target of 300,000 helps to stop snacking on the odd new hire here and there,” it said. 
 
Doesn’t this newspaper realise that it is people’s jobs and the lives that have been messed up which it was referring to? It is almost callous to describe them as snacks to be eaten and then spat out at will, if they don’t prove out to be tasty enough. 

I could still recall the bright spark of anticipation on a former colleague’s eye as he left to join Citi some months ago.

I had watched his departure with some misgivings, as he was moving to a bank whose financial problems had been widely reported, and at a time when job security should have been of paramount consideration. 

But he is single and has few commitments.

I was also delighted at the enthusiasm he was bringing to his new job and the contributions that he might be making there after learning his ropes here. I hope he is still doing okay.  

The financial crisis will continue to unfold and surprise us in other ways.

It is also turning into a big reality check like nothing, which Singaporeans who had entered the workforce during the last couple of boom years, have experienced before.



Tags: , , ,

 
Total comments: 4
ATAN
November 18, 2008 Tuesday

I do not feel as painful on the CITIBank axe as compared to the AXE coming down on DBS 900. Afterall, any retrenched ex-citibank employees may find their way into local bank, particularly DBS and OCBC. The Structured Deposit and Sub-prime lending were products from the Big American Banks and then introduced to Local Banks by bankers from big american banks. these so-called Up to Market bankers were then rewarded with fat bonues together with their bosses, so called experienced Risk Managers for being Innovative and introducing profitable products. When the products turned bad, the poor RMs, loaded with monthly target to meet, elderly employees considered as not innovative or clever and "non-productive" employees were retrenched. I hope it is time for local Bank Management to take a closer look into their executives and also to determine whether a Bak Chor Mee stall should sell Innovative Burgers.

comment 1283 | Offensive? Report this comment
CT
November 18, 2008 Tuesday

Citibank as a corporation and it's management do not deserve any sympathy. Unfortuntely, the workers will suffer in the end - may they be hard working or not. This was way overdue. Citibank is too big and has taken on too much in a short time that quality of service has suffered termendously. For the workers, they, as part of a public company have a channel to speak out against any wrongful ethics violations by superiors - so, the symathy to them can be minimized. It's survival of the fittest out there.

comment 1282 | Offensive? Report this comment
Ivan G
November 18, 2008 Tuesday

Though not applied to all, I have seen from an article how he suggests that we do not need to sympathise with the bankers and high management of the reputable banks. Just 2 years ago, while most of us are still raging and worrying about the increase in cost of living, they are there enjoying the so called benefits of the great increase in profits from banking industry (now we know how they have so much profits by selling mismatch products and packaged credits). They are the ones who has enjoyed more than 10 months bonus while the rest are still struggling over their daily meals. SO when finally the heaven collapse and they are facing job lost, why is that we should be feeling sorry for them? If they have managed to save and spend like we do during their prime days, they should still be better off than us in today's terms. But of course there are exceptions and those I truly sym with them on not reaps the benefits but faces the axes.....

comment 1280 | Offensive? Report this comment
Reuben
November 18, 2008 Tuesday

This is a dog eat dog world. Does really any one care? If the guy next door is dying of hunger, we still dont mind eating cream cakes.
Dont we have real leaders, CEOs, who have the gurs to say, even if our accounts go in the red, we will care about our people. Staff retrenchment is always avoidable. We we throw out anyone out of our family, if there is a crisis at home? Its a cruel world out there. They would rather slash and break lives, provided it doesnt affect that fat pay packets. And above they will have the nerve to empathize and say ' it was such a hard decision to make'.

comment 1271 | Offensive? Report this comment

Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply:

(1) Stay on topic;
(2) No abuse, please;
(3) No personal attacks;
(4) No curse words;
(5) Don't SCREAM in ALL CAPS!

To encourage a meaningful and pleasant dialogue, comments may be deleted. We look forward to your participation!

Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions