|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kwan Weng Kin
Japan Correspondent
Three Japanese laureates or two?
October 10, 2008 Friday, 12:06 PM
Kwan Weng Kin looks at how Japanese media have claimed them all.
In Tokyo WHEN the three winners of this year’s Nobel Prize for physics were announced on Tuesday evening, the Japanese media went wild with excitement. “Three Japanese have won”, screamed the Japanese headlines, blithely ignoring the fact that one of the three men – Yoichiro Nambu – holds American nationality. Even those Japanese newspapers and TV networks that cared to point out that Nambu had acquired US citizenship long ago, continued to regard him as “Japanese” in their headlines and reports. However, foreign news media were careful to note that Nambu is a “Japan-born, American” physicist. Their headlines said: “Two Japanese, One American win Nobels”. Which is only to be expected. In fact, Nambu, who moved to the US in 1952 to pursue his research, is a classic example of the “brain drain” that hit Japan during those early post-war years. Many like him never returned home. In 1970, Nambu took up American citizenship. The influential Asahi Shimbun daily is so far the only major newspaper to have brought up this issue of whether it is correct to regard Nambu as Japanese. In an article posted on its web site, the Asahi quoted a government official as saying however that it would not be right not to add Nambu’s prize to Japan’s Nobel tally. The official attitude towards Nambu’s nationality sadly reflects how the Japanese look at nationality issues. A Cabinet minister recently had to resign, just five days after he was appointed, for saying that the Japanese are “ethnically homogeneous”. His statement plainly disregards those who hold Japanese nationality but who may be either a minority like the indigenous Ainu people or people who came originally from other countries. Curiously, the Japanese media sometimes “disowns” a Japanese even when he or she holds Japanese citizenship. A case in point is former Peruvian president Alberto Fujimori, who never gave up his Japanese nationality. One wonders how the government and the media would have treated Fujimori had he turned out to be a great statesman, instead of the diplomatic embarrassment that he has become. Tags: culture, japan
Your comments are welcome. The following rules apply: |
|
|
Other blogs by Kwan Weng Kin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
|
Best viewed at 1152x864 resolution with IE 6.0 or
FireFox 2.0 and above Copyright © 2007 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co.
Regn No. 198402868E | Privacy Statement
| Terms & Conditions
|
[quote]The American public still cannot accept a foreign-born US citizen to run for President.[/quote]
I am sure there were, and still are, concerns about a foreign country planting a sleeper to seize control of the executive branch of the US government.
AFAIK, Clause 5 of Article 2 had been part of the US Constitution since its inception. The new nation had grounds to fear revival of pro-British sentiments.
Never mind the US - how willing are Singaporeans to have a non-Singaporean as President or Prime Minister, especially a first gen migrant citizen who had not served NS or came to Singapore as an adult?
[quote]Schwarzenegger received honours from Austria. Thais celebrated Tiger Woods like one of their own.[/quote]
These are hardly comparable to making them head of governments.
[quote]Close to 99% of Japan’s population are ethnic Japanese. Is it surprising Japanese think of the country and the race as synonymous?[/quote]
It tends to happen with countries like China and Korea and India which had long history and strong cultural roots of their own, especially when their overseas folks stand out physicially.
Even the Irish in the US retain a strong link to Ireland, and the Irish believe themselves no less distinctive and unique as a people, no matter which part of the world the Irish migrate to.
The American public still cannot accept a foreign-born US citizen to run for President. Schwarzenegger received honours from Austria. Thais celebrated Tiger Woods like one of their own.
Close to 99% of Japan's population are ethnic Japanese. Is it surprising Japanese think of the country and the race as synonymous?
Since the Nobel prizes are awarded to individuals rather than their countries, nationalities of the recipients do not matter.
In fact, it will defeat the ultimate dream of Alfred Nobel - peace and global unity - if the Nobel prize is turned into a one-upmanship competition among the nations.
None of the achievement of any Nobel laurate is (supposedly) reserved for his/her own countrymen. All the achievements in Physics, Chemistry, Literature, Medicine, are made available to the whole world.